Although different in their physical environment, climate and scale, New Zealand and Australia are closely integrated regionally, economically, politically and culturally. The two countries have drawn closer and become more entwined since 1980.
Australia and New Zealand had quite separate indigenous histories, settled at different times by very different peoples – Australia from Indonesia or New Guinea around 50,000 years ago, New Zealand from islands in the tropical Pacific around 1250–1300 AD.
They first came together in the European imagination when a French scholar, Charles de Brosses, described the imagined southern continent as ‘Australasie’ (from the Latin for ‘south of Asia’) in 1756, and British explorer James Cook, searching for that continent, mapped New Zealand and the east coast of New South Wales in 1769–70.
‘Australasia’ had fuzzy boundaries. In the first half of the 19th century maps depicted Australasia as comprising Australia and the adjacent islands, including both New Zealand and New Guinea. In some definitions the group even reached into the Pacific, including Fiji. Australian dictionaries still define Australasia as ‘the Australian continent and neighbouring islands.’1 When New Zealanders used the term it meant no more than Australia and New Zealand. It was never popular. In the mid-1920s there was a major campaign led by chambers of commerce and the High Commissioner in London to abolish it as demeaning to New Zealand. However, many organisations continued to use the term.
Australia and New Zealand were both colonised by Britain. New South Wales was the mother colony for New Zealand as well as for eastern Australia. Māori were involved from the start in shaping trans-Tasman relations. Ngāpuhi chiefs invited the first missionaries from Australia in 1814 and chose the first New Zealand flag in 1834 so that they could ply the waters and trade with New South Wales.
Constitutionally New Zealand began as an extension of the colony of New South Wales, which was its status when the Treaty of Waitangi was signed in 1840. New Zealand became a separate colony in 1841.
Many early New Zealand settlers came from Australia – some ex-convicts, some pastoral squatters bringing skills in sheep farming, and in the 1860s many gold miners, who moved from the goldfields of Victoria to Otago and the West Coast. Melbourne, not Sydney, was the port of departure. In the last decades of the 19th century labourers and shearers moved back and forth across the Tasman following work.
During those years New Zealand was known as one of the seven colonies of Australasia. Yet the idea of Australasia failed to unite the colonies. Instead the concept of Australia – ‘a nation for a continent’ – triumphed with the establishment of the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901.
Australian federation created an asymmetry of size and power between a suddenly large Australia and small New Zealand. At the time, New Zealand was doing better economically than the Australian colonies and both were restructuring relations with Britain. Federation was more a matter of sentiment than a business deal. New Zealand chose not to become Australia’s seventh state for similar reasons. New Zealanders shared the feelings that drove Australians to federate: they aspired to identity, status and a grander future. Racial attitudes coloured this sentiment. The ‘crimson thread of kinship’ – the British blood tie – ran through all seven colonies. But that was not enough to persuade New Zealanders to join Australia. People feared federation might put New Zealand’s social reforms at risk. Richard Seddon preferred to be premier of an independent country rather than of an Australian state that ranked third after New South Wales and Victoria.
New Zealanders believed they were a better type. Some saw Australia’s tropical north as a threat to their community’s racial – and social – purity. New Zealanders endorsed the White Australia policy but wondered how Australia could be white when it included Queensland with its population of indentured labourers from Melanesia.
Australian federation consolidated national identity on both sides of the Tasman, strengthening views that New Zealand should not sacrifice its independence.
Politician and writer William Pember Reeves treated the seven Australasian colonies (including New Zealand) as a single site of social experiment in his State experiments in Australia and New Zealand (1902), even though he emphasised environmental differences in his marketing role as agent general in London.
There was a trans-Tasman transfer of policy and innovation. The seven colonies shared a model of state development. This had its basis in their British constitutional heritage and British law, as well as in participation in inter-colonial and imperial (later Commonwealth) conferences. The shared model was highly efficient because it saved time and resources.
One shared policy was the system of compulsory arbitration in industrial disputes, established between 1890 and 1914, and the male-breadwinner model of labour and welfare during much of the 20th century.
There was a similar pattern of policy convergence in the 1980s and 1990s, when both countries abandoned this model. In the 1990s Victoria borrowed many of its public-sector reforms from New Zealand. Convergence, however, did not mean uniformity. Each learnt from, and adapted, the other’s experiences.
New Zealand secured formal ties of influence in Australian government structures in the late 20th century. New Zealand participated in the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) from 1992. The country functioned like a seventh state in COAG ministerial councils and committees (but not premiers’ conferences). By the early 2000s New Zealand was a member or observer on about half the COAG ministerial councils.
A joint institution to regulate food standards, Food Standards Australia and New Zealand, grew out of COAG in 1996, as did the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Arrangement (TTMRA) from 1998. This provided for a single trans-Tasman market for the sale of goods and registration of occupations.
The Anzac tradition, while central to both countries’ national stories and identities, is also the sentimental cornerstone of New Zealand’s relations with Australia. Forces from both countries served together at Gallipoli, Turkey, in the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) during the First World War, and the anniversary of the original landing (25 April 1915) became Anzac Day, a proxy national day for both countries. The Anzac hero was a common masculine type descended from the British soldier, who embodied service, bravery, initiative and mateship. Together, Australians and New Zealanders were, formally, Anzacs. But on the Western Front they both became ‘diggers’, and informally ‘Aussies’ and ‘Kiwis’.
Yet the legend differed in the two countries. The archetypal New Zealand Anzac was a natural gentleman, the archetypal Australian a larrikin. This difference is explained by reference points. Australians – the larger force – defined themselves in contrast with the British, while New Zealand soldiers in the First World War defined themselves in contrast with both British and Australians.
The countries differed on conscription since Australia’s Defence Act 1903 stipulated conscription for home defence but only volunteers for overseas service, and Australians rejected conscription twice, in 1916 and 1917. All the Australian Anzacs in the First World War were volunteers, whereas New Zealand included conscripts.
Both Australia and New Zealand erected many war memorials after the First World War. But most New Zealand memorials listed only those who died, while most Australian ones listed all those who served. In New Zealand the focus of Anzac Day services was the laying of wreaths on the memorial while in Australia it was the march of the veterans. It seems likely that this was because all Australian soldiers were volunteers who should therefore be honoured. In New Zealand the many dead were the primary focus of memory.
Australia had a greater concern than New Zealand about military threats from Asia. This was expressed first in Australia’s decision to withdraw its troops from the European theatre during the Second World War to defend the homeland, while New Zealand retained forces in Europe.
Defence remained an area of divergence and occasional dispute because New Zealand did not feel as threatened as Australia. Yet the Anzac partners signed the Anzac (Canberra) Pact in 1944 and the ANZUS alliance with the United States in 1951. Divergence in defence policy peaked during the ANZUS crisis of 1984–86 when New Zealand fell out with the United States over the nuclear character of the alliance, and so unsettled Australia, for whom relations with the United States were of foremost importance.
In 2003 Australia took part in the United States-led invasion of Iraq while New Zealand refused to be involved.
However, as New Zealand’s defence relationship with the United States weakened there were efforts to cultivate stronger links with Australia. From 1991 a formal Closer Defence Relations (CDR) programme involved common training, joint defence exercises, complementary defence equipment and an ANZAC frigate programme. Since 1997 there have been joint Anzac peacekeeping operations in Bougainville, Timor Leste (East Timor), the Solomon Islands and Tonga.
For New Zealand, economic relations are the cornerstone of the whole relationship with Australia. New Zealand sought reciprocity in trade relations from 1870, but this did not occur until the Closer Economic Relations (CER) trade agreement, effective from 1983.
New Zealand passed an act allowing reciprocal reduced tariffs for the Australian colonies in 1870, but Britain did not permit this. Premier Richard Seddon sought a trade deal with South Australia in 1895, which was stalled by the Australian federal movement. He tried again with Australia in 1906, just before he died.
However, throughout the 19th century Australia was a major trading partner of New Zealand. In the mid-1860s about 60% of trade was with Australia, and then through to the 1890s it was normally over 20%. The countries were linked by telegraph in 1876 and shared the costs of international mail services.
From the early 20th century New Zealand’s closer economic links with the UK hindered trans-Tasman trade relations. There were fierce conflicts between the countries over imports of potatoes and apples from New Zealand and citrus from Australia. There was some progress with the first Australia–New Zealand trade agreement in 1922, and its successor in 1933, both based on British preferential tariffs, reflective of dominion ties with Britain. But trade did not boom. The proportion of New Zealand exports by value going across the Tasman fell from about 20% in 1900 to 5% in 1920, and remained below that figure for the next 40 years. Australia supplied 12–18% of New Zealand imports by value.
In 1909 the pipfruit disease of fireblight was found on New Zealand pears and apples, and although there was little evidence that it could spread on ripe fruit, Australia banned most fruits and plants from New Zealand in 1921. Two years earlier the discovery of corky scab on New Zealand potatoes had also led to an embargo. Then in 1932 New Zealand reciprocated by prohibiting Australian fruit and vegetable imports because of fruit fly. The Second World War settled the dispute over potatoes. In August 2011 Australia lifted the ban on New Zealand apples.
In response to Britain’s growing interest in joining the European Economic Community (EEC, now the European Union or EU), a New Zealand–Australia Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed in 1965, but retained British preferences. The deputy prime ministers and trade ministers John McEwen and John Marshall collaborated to combat agricultural protectionism and promote the two countries’ economic development.
NAFTA built a platform of networks and relationships in business and government, which made it possible to start afresh under Closer Economic Relations (CER) from January 1983.
CER, an achievement of the conservative Robert Muldoon and Malcolm Fraser governments, provided for a phased removal of duties and quotas. From 1990, five years ahead of schedule, there were no tariffs or quantitative restrictions on trade in goods. The agreement drove a 500% increase in trade over 20 years and New Zealand’s exports to Australia rose to over 20% by value of its total exports. Australia became New Zealand’s principal trading partner and by far its leading source of investment, although not vice versa (in 2010 New Zealand was Australia’s seventh-largest trading partner). A 1988 agreement also provided, with some exceptions, for free trade in services. A 1998 agreement established a single trans-Tasman market for government procurement. New Zealand’s leading banks, its largest media company and many retail outlets were Australian in 2011.
After 2001 there was a conscious effort at official levels to develop networks and closer integration, especially in law and business. One champion of closer business integration was the Australia–New Zealand Leadership Forum, which first met in 2004, when the two governments announced the goal of a Single Economic Market (SEM). The SEM process was designed to reduce differences in the business operating environments of the two neighbours. The forum met annually from that time.
There were moves towards legal integration in 2010 with the creation of a trans-Tasman judicial area under Trans-Tasman Proceedings acts passed in both parliaments. A memorandum of understanding on the coordination of business law, signed in 2006 and revised in 2010, required officials to cooperate ‘to ensure opportunities for deeper business integration and commercial benefits are maximised’.1 There have also been debates about a common currency, but no firm proposal.
As in the 19th century, the 20th and 21st centuries have seen much trans-Tasman people movement. In the early 1900s many Australians moved to New Zealand, including significant migrants who were active in the union movement and Labour Party. Michael Joseph Savage’s 1935 Labour government cabinet included five MPs born in Australia, including Savage himself. From the late 1960s the flow was reversed, and Kiwis went west to Australia. By 2006 for every 100 New Zealanders in New Zealand there were 15 living in Australia. In 2009 New Zealand was the second-largest contributor of migrants to Australia’s population. Australia became an extension of home because of visits to family, on holiday or business. Almost all Māori had whānau across the Tasman in the early 2000s. Whereas one in 50 Māori lived in Australia in 1966, that proportion rose to one in six or seven by 2006.
New Zealanders have free entry to Australia under the Trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement, which allows them to reside and work there for an indefinite period. Combined queues for New Zealand and Australian passport holders at airports were introduced in 2005, and ‘smart gate’ technology at the border in 2009.
From 1948 the two countries had a social-security agreement, but after 2001, apart from age pensions, only New Zealanders who were permanent residents or also citizens of Australia qualified for other benefits. Australians in New Zealand were treated as if they were New Zealanders.
Similarity of origins and regular contact encouraged cultural similarities.
Family bonds between New Zealand and Australia came to the fore in 2009 and 2011 in response to natural disasters on both sides of the Tasman, renewing the Anzac spirit. New Zealand sent firefighters to help in the Victorian bushfires of February 2009, while Australia responded strongly to the devastating earthquake that struck Christchurch on 22 February 2011 by flying in over 750 people, including police and medical personnel. Both countries held minutes of silence in their parliaments to remember the lives lost in the two events.
The Anzac biscuit emerged as both countries’ ‘national’ biscuit in the 20th century. Rolled oats, the basic ingredient, had a Scottish heritage. The pavlova performed a parallel role as both nations’ national dessert. Lamb and potatoes were other common foods. The breakfast staple of Sanitarium Weetbix was advertised as good for ‘Aussie kids’ and ‘Kiwi kids’ in a trans-Tasman food market. But Sanitarium’s Marmite spread competed in New Zealand with Australian Vegemite.
Strong ties of popular culture bridged the Tasman. Australian radio serials like ‘Dad and Dave’ and ‘Life with Dexter’ were popular in New Zealand. From the late 1930s the Kiwi performer Tex Morton was Australia’s first music idol, while Māori show bands and rock groups such as Split Enz became widely acclaimed in Australia.
Australian publications like the Bulletin, Truth and Pix were popular in New Zealand, and writers moved both ways – the poet Henry Lawson spent time in New Zealand, while author Jean Devanny and comedian John Clarke settled in Australia.
The legendary racehorse Phar Lap won the affection and national pride of both countries. Born in Timaru in 1926, he was sold to an Australian owner in 1928. The gangling chestnut went on to win 37 races out of 51 starts, including the 1930 Melbourne Cup and the world’s richest race, the 1932 Agua Caliente Handicap in Tijuana, Mexico. He died mysteriously three weeks later, and his body was divided between Australia and New Zealand – his skeleton is at Te Papa in Wellington, his massive heart is in a jar at the Australian National Museum, Canberra, and his hide is at the Museum Victoria, Melbourne.
Horse racing has for over 150 years been a shared passion, and New Zealand punters and public follow the Melbourne Cup, Australia’s premier race. Games between the nations in rugby, league, cricket, netball, soccer and minor sports are always intense and sometimes ill-mannered affairs. The famous incident in a one-day cricket game in 1981 when an Australian bowler rolled the last ball underarm – against the spirit but not the rules of the game – became, for New Zealanders at least, a symbol of the distrust which sport can engender. Since the 1990s New Zealand teams have competed in Australian-based competitions in netball, soccer, rugby league and basketball, and both Australian and New Zealand teams compete with South Africa in the Super 15 rugby competition and the tri-nations. Bathurst in Australia is a focus for auto-racing fans.
In 2011 New Zealand’s relations with Australia were closer than they had ever been. In trade, the movement of peoples, culture and attitudes the countries shared much. While Australasia as a term had fallen from favour, the two countries shared a common destiny in the Asia–Pacific region.
James, Colin. ‘Foreign and family: the Australian connection – sensible sovereignty or niggling nationalism?’ In New Zealand and the world: the major foreign policy issues, 2005–2010, edited by Brian Lynch. Wellington: NZIIA, 2006, pp. 29–37.
McLean, Denis. The prickly pair: making nationalism in Australia and New Zealand. Dunedin: University of Otago Press, 2003.
Mein Smith, Philippa. ‘New Zealand.’ In The centenary companion to Australian federation, edited by Helen Irving. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 400–405.
Mein Smith, Philippa. ‘The Tasman world.’ In The New Oxford history of New Zealand, edited by Giselle Byrnes. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2009, 297–319.
Mein Smith, Philippa, Peter Hempenstall and Shaun Goldfinch. Remaking the Tasman world. Christchurch: Canterbury University Press, 2008.
Sinclair, Keith. A destiny apart: New Zealand’s search for national identity. Wellington: Allen & Unwin/Port Nicholson Press, 1986.
Sinclair, Keith, ed. Tasman relations: New Zealand and Australia, 1788–1988. Auckland: Auckland University Press, 1987.
The commission’s site provides links to official documents on the relationship with New Zealand.
The libraries’ site includes links to further information on New Zealand–Australia relations.
MFAT’s site includes an overview of New Zealand’s relations with Australia.
An Australian view of relations with New Zealand, from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.